Meew Meeww!

In the graphic novel Citizen Rex authors’ Mario and Gilbert Hernandez tells a story about discrimination and exploitation. While in traditional written word stories an author uses descriptions and can pace the story through word choice and prose, graphic novels have some limitations on this but are given the added benefit of having panels of pictures to help this process along. These panels also help tell the story like a truncated film or television show. The choice of using many panels for a scene or few is a choice that can affect how the reader interprets it. When there is a break between panels the reader is than left using their imagination on how to see this. Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics explains this in detail and the significance of this on the story being told. When reading the Hernandez brother’s story these choices really affected the scene, such as, starting halfway down pg. 22 ending on pg. 23. It opens on Renata Skinks apartment, giving a wide shot of the building with a basic description of the name of the apartment complex and who lives there. In the next panel the inside of the apartment is shown with a woman, stating that this isn’t Renata but her daughter Sigi. Also, my attention was drawn to the shadow behind Sigi. While it is not person shaped and could still turn out to be nothing, I was left with the impression and feeling that it is a person. The closure is confirmed when in the next panel you see that it is, with the much more man shaped shadow, also it is more realistic because it is supposed to Sigi seeing the shadow and not just an impression of one. She then goes to look for the intruder whose shadow she saw in the mirror. While doing this she is confronted by Citizen Rex. The idea that the shadow is something else initially is also helped along by the sounds its makes, Meew meeww, leading one to think of a cat. This scene sets up two important characters and how their lives are connected even if they didn’t realize it themselves.

Miss Clairol

1. Why is Arlene called a romantic by the narrator? What makes Arlene want to forget her first time? What does this say about Mexican American women and their thoughts on love and sexuality?

2.What is Arlene wearing in K-Mart? Why does she wear clothes that are too small for her? What does this say about Mexican American women and their ideas of body image?

...And the Earth Did Not Devour Him

Tomás Rivera’s And the Earth Did Not Devour Him is a memoir-esqe story about a migrant worker family in the 1940’s and 50’s. It is told in very short stories with vignettes in between them. His bleak description of the life is very eye opening and powerful. In contrast Richard Rodriguez’s “Aria” written at a very similar time is about his time growing up in a “gringos” neighborhood, “many blocks from the Mexican south side of town.” Despite the differences in the locations of their childhood, they both had many similar experiences, though there were a few distinct memories to each.    

 Rivera the son of migrant workers relates many stories about his childhood. In “It’s That It Hurts” the narrator explains that he dislikes going to school and would prefer to stay near his family, “I think it’s better staying out here on the ranch, here in the quiet of this knoll, with its chicken coops, or out in the fields where you at least feel more free, more at ease (92).” This is a sentiment initially felt by Rodriguez, who felt that his home he was able to speak “Español: my family’s language. Español: the language that seemed to me a private language” (15) but that “By contrast, English (ingles), rarely heard in the house, was the language I came to associate with gringos (13).” In both stories the narrators feel more comfortable with their families and friends then they do with anyone else.

               Both narrators also go through changes in their views though. In Rivera’s stories you see the narrator lose the religious views of his parents and feels pity and it seems a little disdain for them for having this very superstitious beliefs. While Rodriguez feels alienated from his family because he cannot speak Spanish and feels he has lost some of the closeness to his parents and culture. While Rodriguez feels like he has become more a part of the gringos culture and even makes white friends, Rivera still feels a connection to his parents and culture.

               In And the Earth Did Not Devour Him, at the end of the story you are shown the narrator coming to a realization that people need to come together as they are, whoever they are, “I woud like to see all of the people together. And then, if I had great big arms, I could embrace them all.” This is a view is completely counter to what is stated in “Aria”, “What I needed to learn to learn in school was that I had the right – and the obligation – to speak the public language of los gringos.” This idea of assimilation is counter to most writers of his time and Rodriguez was not the most popular man for it.

               The fact that initially each narrator is in a very similar position and go through some of the same things and then continue on to opposite perspectives on the subject is interesting.  Rodriguez goes onto not only come up with a different opinion as Rivera but also counter to the Chicano/a movement as a whole or at least the majority of it showing that people that live in similar positions can have very different world views once grown.

               Does Rodriguez’s idea that assimilation is what the Chicano/as should do because of the alienation he felt from his family and family friends once he couldn’t speak Spanish as well?

                -Aaron

Never Marry a Mexican

Never Marry a Mexican

“I’ll never marry. Not a man. I’ve known men too intimately. I’ve witnessed their infidelities, and I’ve helped them to it. Unzipped and unhooked and agreed to clandestine maneuvers. I’ve been accomplice, committed premeditated crimes. I’m guilty of having caused deliberate pain to other women. I’m vindictive and cruel, and I’m capable of anything.”

Never Marry a Mexican is a short story written by Sandra Cisneros in 1991 in a first person narrative told through the narrator, Clemencia, whose name while reminding one of the clemency, shows throughout the story that her name is a type of irony because of her cruel and vindictive actions throughout the narrative. I chose the second paragraph on page 68 to look at and discuss.

In this paragraph the narrator starts out giving exposition why she will never marry any man, saying she has witnessed their infidelities this contrasts with the end of the paragraph where she is the one being cruel, vindictive, and capable of anything. The tone starts out accusatory while shifting toward guilty, this shows the reader that while she accuses men of horrible things she is just as guilty as they are. The anger heard at the beginning of the piece with statements, such as, “I’ll never marry. Not a man,” contrasts with the almost sadness heard at the paragraph leading the reader to empathize with the protagonist even when you do not agree with the things she has done. The informal diction, with many contractions, leads one to hear the narrator as giving a confession of guilt. This idea is reinforced by the syntax of the sentence, “unzipped and unhooked and agreed to clandestine meetings,” and the lack of a person this sentence about. This forces the reader to mentally think who has done this, the men or the narrator.

This paragraph also has the start of a motif in the narrative, that of trust. The narrator will never trust men enough to marry them and not only will she not trust men but she should not be trusted as well. This also is foreshadowing of things to come in the story, you know that not only will you see men as untrustworthy individuals, cheating on their significant others, you will be seeing the narrator doing the same thing and seeing her do perhaps even crueler things. 

In this story, Sandra Cisneros, makes the audience empathize with the protagonist even with the things that Clemencia has done. The reader wants to give her clemency because while she is cruel and vindictive she is a woman who loves a man who she will not be with, by her own actions and is forced to choose his son. The story sometimes takes on the feel that she is telling it to his son while other times it seems to be a recollection for herself. It made me feel like she was recalling the whole thing for the son but was getting caught up in the memories in the process.

-Aaron

I am Joaquin

I am Joaquin is a free verse poem by Rodolfo Corky Gonzales about the struggle of "la raza" (the people of indigenous descent in Mexico) against the cultural invasion on their country. It is written in two very lengthy stanzas with lines of various length including a couple with just a single word.

I found this poem very inspiring, I could feel the speakers resolve and anger. The speaker recalls many occasions where the indigenous people fight against the people keeping them down. The martyrs, such as, "Los Ninos" who stayed behind after their general ordered a retreat to stay and fight and the last of the surviving member of the six men grabbed their countries flag, wrapped it around himself, and leapt off castle point to prevent it from entering enemy hands, and the defenders of the people, like, Joaquin Carrillo Murrieta who is called the Mexican/Chilean Robin Hood or the Robin Hood of El Dorado. It is hard for me to place whether he is in Mexico or in the United States when writing this, I see his descriptions of the 'whirl of a gringo society' and also his descriptions of Mexican society and am unable to decide which country he is speaking, I am leaning toward United States but truly this is just a feeling not a definitive knowing.

I can hear the speakers dislike about being "caught up in the whirl or a gringo society, confused by the rules and scorned by attitudes, suppressed by manipulation and destroyed by modern society" and yet if this is taking place in the United States I am not sure I can understand his dilemma about choosing between the victory of spirit or having a full stomach. I just have no understanding of having to make the choice and I think that this helped me see it differently than I had before. I had always believed that you can do both, and I think  that you probably can in some instances but now I am aware that this is not always the case. This makes me feel that forcing that choice, of culture or acceptance, is unfair.

The passion in this piece is palpable, you can feel is indecision and yet he resolve to give in to this intrusion on his culture and history. It is heartening to listen to him start out seeming almost despondent and then find his mind being made up in the poem. You start hearing him lament about the choice and him struggling with the choice and then the speaker ends with his mind made up and his choice made, that he won't give up who he is for anything, and he will fight the fact that he is even being made to choose.

When he travels through the history settling into different times and as different people really effectively shows how not only that his culture is strong and always resists being beaten down but also shows that it deserves to be kept and respected. You feel yourself at the end of the poem feeling an affinity for him and his fight. This poem is very emotionally charged, it not only shows you the strength of people for their culture but why a people's culture deserves to be defended. No one should be forced to chose between their culture and having a full stomach.

-Aaron

Just trying this out.

I shall be blogging.